Digital ID is a Conspiracy...

It all starts with a digital ID. It all starts here.

We are moving into a time where the state becomes more authoritarian because the state is scared. It is utterly terrified of what is to come. It knows that we're heading towards crisis after crisis after crisis from a demographic situation to our immigration situation to our financial situation.

So the state does the only thing it can: grip tighter. And the tighter it grips, the more we, the English people, the British people will suffer. The future is a bleak one.

I want you to imagine for me a future where everything you do, everything you see, everything you say, and almost everything you think is tracked, monitored, and understood. Imagine an invasive state that could so thoroughly understand everything that you do that it could create a system by which it incentivizes behavior which backs the state and disincentivizes behavior which does not.

Now you don't have to go very far to imagine this world because on the other side of the world there's a place called China and China has exactly that system. Now the Chinese people didn't wake up one day and have this system. No, it all started with a digital ID. That is a system in which the government ascertains your identity using digital means. And so that ID can connect up to many other sources within the government.

At first they'll say it's convenient. Isn't it so convenient that everything links up to one place, that it's all about interactions with the government? It's all in one place, one hub. Because the government know that your desire for convenience is a tool that can be used, manipulated, and exploited for them to bring in their draconian authoritarian measures, because like I said before, they are losing control. They're losing control.

And when a state loses control, they do the only thing they can and they grip and they grip tighter. It all starts with a digital ID. It all starts here with that one feature. It sets the foundations, the framework for a system which integrates seamlessly with your everyday life. From your banking to your social media to your work to getting petrol to leaving where you live, it all links up to this one system. And that's where it starts.

Now, the UK's version of a digital ID system is the brainchild of one man. And that man is Tony Blair, or as we know him on the right, the dark lord. Why do we call him the dark lord? Because he is so persistent. He is so persistent and consistent with his evil that he will do whatever it takes to get what he wants. He has been working on this for decades, decades and decades.

The truth is, a digital ID will be more convenient. It'll be more convenient for all the ways in which we interact with government. That is just the truth. Or at least it should be if the government was actually competent. That's yet to be seen. But theoretically, it should make things a lot more convenient, but it's the thin end of the wedge.

I would rather have an inefficient relationship with my government than a super-efficient one, which opens the door to draconian and authoritarian measures, which could absolutely control my life, the life of my family, and the life of my children and grandchildren for many years to come. I will absolutely choose baked-in inefficiency with the government every single time because I do not trust the government and neither should you.

Back when Tony Blair was prime minister, he wanted to institute a digital ID system. But the technology wasn't there and there was mass push back. So what does he do? He waits and waits. He builds up the Tony Blair Institute and begins to infiltrate governments all across the world. How do we know that he did this? Because he tells us, he tells us that he works in dozens and dozens of countries all across the globe.

So he buys his time. He waits. He waits for the perfect opportunity of two things. The first is for the technology to catch up, which now it has thanks to China. And the second is a crisis. What kind of crisis? A migrant crisis. Because if we are able to get a migrant crisis, it makes it so much easier to justify a digital ID system. You can imagine it now. Oh, we all know exactly who's meant to be here and not by using this digital ID system. That way we can fix this crisis with the boats and these migrants.

But we know that the problem was created by the government in the first place. We know the problem was created by a government that was incapable or more likely unwilling to act and do what was necessary. The previous government were running an open borders experiment because a failure on this scale isn't just bad luck. It isn't a global trend or taking your eye off the ball. No, this is a different order of failure. This happened by design, not accident.

As always in any government, they create the problem followed by the solution quickly afterwards. This is textbook. It's state control 101. Create the problem, get the solution, execute the solution to the problem the state created in the first place.

Now, as I was making this video, I was doing some research and I found something that genuinely terrified me. And that was my thinking was that all of this was now going to have to go through parliament and we were going to have to get new legislation and we should fight this tooth and nail. But unfortunately, we've already lost.

In June of this year, 2025, the government enacted something called the Data Use and Access Act 2025. This piece of legislation is over 233 pages long, and I'm not going to stand here and bore you with it. So, let me break down some of the most important parts of this legislation.

This legislation has already been passed. The groundwork is already there. It's been built over the last decade with it now accelerating. This one piece of legislation that I'm demonstrating to you now allows the government to retain biometric data for supposed anti-terrorism purposes. It allows the sharing of online data for supposed child safety initiatives. It allows the sharing of data across your utilities to know how much gas and electricity that you're using.

The government isn't moving towards a more totalitarian state where they have more understanding and control of you. We're already there. It's already happened. While we were all fighting over an online safety act that was passed the previous year under the Conservative government, the Labor government was instigating some of the most draconian and authoritarian measures in the entirety of British history. All in order to control you, to understand your data.

Once they have access to your data and it's centralized, the state then have the power to combine it all together into a system that controls you. This is China. This is the future of facial recognition systems. You have to use a facial recognition system in order to get petrol for fuel for your car. We're already seeing in the UK facial recognition systems are being rolled out across towns and cities alike. That combined with the creation of these 5-minute neighborhoods, these 5-minute cities where everything is in a 5-minute walking area, it is starting to look like a state is determined to move into a more authoritarian direction, which as we know with the dark lord is the dark lord's vision.

Chapter 7 in this book talks about the CCP. He talks about the importance of moving ahead, moving on, being more effective, getting away from anything which disrupts delivery. He has it very, very clear on his page. Strategy, policy, delivery, always unlocking the power of tech.

This is our future. Our future is a Chinese style surveillance state. This is where we're moving to. And this is the thin end of the wedge. So when someone asks me why are you against digital ID? Because it is the thin end of the wedge. It starts here. It starts at a problem that was created by the government in the first place.

Some will say, "Oh yeah, they didn't make the boats come here, but they created an environment which encouraged and incentivizes people to come here." It's very easy to turn people away at sea. But the truth is the government was too weak. They were too weak to do this. We just created the system and they created the problem in the first place. Create the problem, manufacture consent for the solution, implement the solution. It's textbook. It is absolutely textbook. It is state control 101.

So I'm anti-digital ID because digital ID makes it easy for governments to centralize your data. Whether it's gas, electricity, social media, banking, you name it, they will know about it. And once that happens, it is an irresistible urge for governments that are terrified of losing power to institute more and more draconian systems of control and governance just like we see with China.

If we have a digital ID system, mark my words, the next step is monitoring everything you do from what you say online, from who you speak to, who you interact with, where you go, how you get there, how much fuel you're able to buy, what food you're able to buy. It will all be controlled centrally by the government, probably in a points-based system, just like China.

And the worst part of this, the legislation's already been put through in June. It's already happened. All that's happening now is the government manufacturing consent. That's what you're about to see. What you're about to see is the government is going to consistently manufacture consent for the downfall of liberty in this country and for the greater control of its people by the government by a draconian system. And the people will want it.

By the time the media has finished this media cycle, the people will want to be controlled. I guarantee it. They'll be clamoring for a digital ID system without knowing or understanding that A, the legislation's already there, and B, it was all part of the plan in the first place. A plan created by, you know, who, the dark lord himself. He even talks about it in his book. He talks about it again and again and again.

I've always made it really clear to everyone I spoke to. I would leave this country on one condition. That is if we had a digital ID system which connects to a point-based system. I could not live in a country like that. The totalitarian surveillance state is just too much. I do not want to be told what I can spend my money to buy. I do not want to be told who I can interact with or what to think or what to feel.

That is the future. We must fight it at every turn. They've already laid the groundwork, which means we have to be the ones to ensure that they cannot go any further with this. Tell your friends, tell your family that this is the future. And unless they make it clear that they will not stand for it, it will happen. We must have the push back that happened in the early 2000s with Tony Blair, there is no other way. We must fight. You must fight otherwise the future is bleak.